Steven Diez vs Iker Urribarrens Ramirez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Mar at 02:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Diez vs I. Urribarrens Ramirez

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Diez 1 - 0 Ramirez
They have played 2 sets in total, with Steven Diez winning 2 and Iker Urribarrens Ramirez winning 0. The last match between Steven Diez and Iker Urribarrens Ramirez was at the M25 Les Franqueses del Valles, 15-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Steven Diez getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Diez | 1 |
| Ramirez | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Les Franqueses del Valles(03-15-25)
S. Diez vs I. U. Ramirez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $335,910 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.64% (571-474) | Career Total W/L | 55.00% (55-45) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 24 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Diez vs I. U. Ramirez Match Preview:
In the context of second serve effectiveness over the last six months, Ramirez has secured 39.19% of points, while Diez has a slightly higher success rate with 41.52%. This aspect of their game is significantly indicative of match predictions, as second serve performance tends to be a reliable predictor of outcomes.
Considering return game performance, Ramirez has outperformed Diez, winning 58.67% of points on their opponent's second serve compared to Diez's 46.96%. The first serve return stats further highlight Ramirez's edge, recording a 32.17% success rate over Diez’s 27.9%. These figures are crucial when favoring one player in head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, Ramirez proves to be slightly more resilient, saving 54.05% of breakpoints faced, as opposed to Diez’s 48.48%. This breakpoint resilience is an invaluable indicator for those interested in in-game betting dynamics. In terms of breakpoint conversion, Ramirez has been slightly more successful, converting 40.91% of opportunities, overshadowing Diez’s 40.7% conversion rate.
Across the past year, a performance overview reveals that Ramirez has achieved a win rate of 63.33% (19 wins, 11 losses), marginally ahead of Diez’s 58.82% win rate (20 wins, 14 losses). This overall winning percentage provides a comprehensive head-to-head prediction framework.
Analyzing their preferred playing surfaces, Ramirez demonstrates relative strength on Clay with a 57% win rate, whereas Diez excels on Hard courts, also achieving a 57% win rate. Conversely, Diez struggles on Grass with a mere 25% success rate (3 wins, 9 losses). These surface preferences could be instrumental in predicting match outcomes depending on the playing surface.
When considering player level and event status, Ramirez has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments under $10K, boasting a 63.33% win rate. Diez, contrastingly, has mainly played in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, with a 47.37% win rate. The event level context is important when drawing comparisons and forecasting favorites for matches.
Opponent quality is another facet where Ramirez holds an advantage, having faced competitors with an average rank of 194.93, compared to Diez's 395.62. Moreover, should this match reach a deciding set, Ramirez would again have the edge with a 56% success rate in deciding sets over the last year, whereas Diez stands at 43%.
Taking into account these comprehensive statistics, Ramirez exhibits consistent strengths across crucial aspects of the game. Therefore, based on the statistical evidence, Ramirez is predicted to have the upper hand in this impending match against Diez.
Steven Diez vs Iker Urribarrens Ramirez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Diez vs I. U. Ramirez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:14:3 | Average Match Time | 1:14:3 |
| 53% (18/34) | 1st Serve % | 55% (23/42) |
| 67% (12/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 63% (10/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 60% (25/42) | Return Points Win % | 35% (12/34) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Diez Recent Matches Played
I. U. Ramirez Recent Matches Played

S. Diez vs I. U. Ramirez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.64% (571/474) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.00% (55/45) |
| 54.52% (1285/1072) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.54% (121/105) |
| 52.19% (11187/10250) | Games Win/Loss | 52.30% (1124/1025) |
| 56.53% (212/163) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.35% (19/18) |
| 55.87% (338/267) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (36/27) |
| 33.96% (18/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1110 | Aces Total | 22 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1791 | Total Double Faults | 148 |
| 1:9:1 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 576.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 245.62 |
| 63% (29963/47216) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1699/2785) |
| 65% (19468/29963) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1026/1699) |
| 49% (8390/17253) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (473/1086) |
| 46% (2388/5143) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (144/339) |
| 42% (20073/47619) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1200/2749) |
| 42.86% (15/20) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (4/12) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34.48% (20/38) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.31% (198/239) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67.47% (334/161) | Futures W/L | 55.00% (55/45) |
| 55% (557/1009) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (55/100) |
| 33% (3/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (109/233) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 18% (3/17) |
| 48% (136/285) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (15/26) |
| 83% (588/490) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (48/43) |
| 16% (588/97) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (48/5) |
| 18% (456/80) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (52/12) |